SentrAI vs the tools
already in your pipeline.
Application security scanners find vulnerabilities. AI reviewers make suggestions. Neither answers the question your board is asking: who let AI touch this code, under what policy, and can you prove it? That's the seam SentrAI owns.
- SentrAI
- ✓Blocks at merge
- GHAS
- ~Secret/CodeQL only
- Snyk
- ~SCA/SAST gates
- CodeRabbit
- ✗Reviewer suggestions
- Semgrep
- ~Rules only
- SentrAI
- ✓Per-event, per-model
- GHAS
- ~Copilot only
- Snyk
- ✗
- CodeRabbit
- ✗
- Semgrep
- ✗
- SentrAI
- ✓
- GHAS
- ✗
- Snyk
- ~Project settings
- CodeRabbit
- ✗
- Semgrep
- ~Rulesets
- SentrAI
- ✓Hash chain + Ed25519
- GHAS
- ~Audit log, not chained
- Snyk
- ✗
- CodeRabbit
- ✗
- Semgrep
- ✗
- SentrAI
- ✓.well-known keys + verifier
- GHAS
- ✗
- Snyk
- ✗
- CodeRabbit
- ✗
- Semgrep
- ✗
- SentrAI
- ✓Per-decision tags
- GHAS
- ✗
- Snyk
- ~SOC 2 reports only
- CodeRabbit
- ✗
- Semgrep
- ~OWASP/CWE
- SentrAI
- ✓
- GHAS
- ✗
- Snyk
- ~CSV report
- CodeRabbit
- ✗
- Semgrep
- ✗
- SentrAI
- ✓< 10 min
- GHAS
- ~Hours
- Snyk
- ~Hours
- CodeRabbit
- ✓Minutes
- Semgrep
- ~Hours
- SentrAI
- ✓RLS per row
- GHAS
- ✓
- Snyk
- ✓
- CodeRabbit
- ✓
- Semgrep
- ✓
- SentrAI
- ✓AI-code governance
- GHAS
- ~SAST + secrets
- Snyk
- ~Deps + SAST
- CodeRabbit
- ~AI reviewer
- Semgrep
- ~Pattern SAST
Keep GHAS, Snyk, or Semgrep for CVEs and pattern-based bugs. SentrAI is the governance layer above them — who wrote it, was it AI, was it allowed.
Scanners live inside eng. SentrAI produces the evidence a security-review committee can sign — mapped to their controls, not yours.
No competitor publishes Ed25519-signed decisions under the org's own key. A regulator can verify a SentrAI proof without logging in.
Comparisons reflect each product's publicly documented capabilities as of 2026. Trademarks belong to their owners. Every claim above is enforced in the SentrAI codebase — inspect the tamper-evident chain live on any proof page.
